Christel Plaza Corp. v. Southern Skating, Inc.

829 So. 2d 382, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16084, 2002 WL 31465740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-1993
StatusPublished

This text of 829 So. 2d 382 (Christel Plaza Corp. v. Southern Skating, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christel Plaza Corp. v. Southern Skating, Inc., 829 So. 2d 382, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16084, 2002 WL 31465740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a dismissal of an intervention action for failure to timely file an amended complaint. Finding the dismissal too severe a sanction under the circumstances herein, which involved the actions of the intervener’s counsel and not his client, we reverse for reinstatement. See e.g. Town of Manalapan v. Florida Power & Light Co., 815 So.2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Rosenberg v. Miller, 453 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Upon remand, the trial court may consider imposing a more appropriate sanction upon the attorney.

Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Manalapan v. Power & Light Co.
815 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Rosenberg v. Miller
453 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 So. 2d 382, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16084, 2002 WL 31465740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christel-plaza-corp-v-southern-skating-inc-fladistctapp-2002.