Christ v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Christ v. Superior Court

100 Cal. App. 433

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 24, 1929

DocketCiv. No. 7020

StatusPublished

This text of 100 Cal. App. 433 (Christ v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christ v. Superior Court, 100 Cal. App. 433 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition herein for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, to make the necessary order for the taking of the deposition of a witness pursuant to letters rogatory issued out of the Third Court of First Instance of the Republic of Guatemala, is denied upon the grounds that the application made to the Superior Court was not accompanied by an affidavit showing the materiality of the testimony of the witness whose deposition was sought, nor did it appear from' said application that the court out of which the letters rogatory issued was a court of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The petition herein for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, to make the necessary order for the taking of the deposition of a witness pursuant to letters rogatory issued out of the Third Court of First Instance of the Republic of Guatemala, is denied upon the grounds that the application made to the Superior Court was not accompanied by an affidavit showing the materiality of the testimony of the witness whose deposition was sought, nor did it appear from' said application that the court out of which the letters rogatory issued was a court of record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 Cal. App. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christ-v-superior-court-calctapp-1929.