Christ v. Dubosky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Christ v. Dubosky

104 A. 547, 261 Pa. 297, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 735

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 6, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 1·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned court did not err in finding that the true date of the filing of the notice of service that the mechanic’s lien had been filed, was July 18, 1913, but, before discharging the rule to show cause, the record ought to have been properly amended. If it had been so amended, this appeal would be dismissed.

And now, May 6, 1918, it is ordered that the entire record be remitted to the court below, that it may amend its record as indicated, and, when so amended, the rule to show cause will be properly discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The learned court did not err in finding that the true date of the filing of the notice of service that the mechanic’s lien had been filed, was July 18, 1913, but, before discharging the rule to show cause, the record ought to have been properly amended. If it had been so amended, this appeal would be dismissed.

And now, May 6, 1918, it is ordered that the entire record be remitted to the court below, that it may amend its record as indicated, and, when so amended, the rule to show cause will be properly discharged.

Christ v. Dubosky, 104 A. 547, 261 Pa. 297, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 735 (Pa. 1918).

Pincite

104 A. 547 (Christ v. Dubosky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related