Chrispen v. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing, Inc.
Opinion
Appellant has filed a plenary appeal from two orders of the circuit court: 1) granting partial summary judgment eliminating several damage claims and determining the only viable claim remaining was for property damage not exceeding $865 and 2) transferring the cause to the county court.
Neither order is a final appealable order nor is either subject to appeal as a nonfinal order. However, since the partial summary judgment cannot be reviewed on plenary appeal from the final judgment in the county court, we shall treat the appeal as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. Having so considered the matter, the petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
478 So. 2d 120 (Chrispen v. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.