Chrispen v. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing, Inc.

478 So. 2d 120, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2527, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16751
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 1985·No. No. 85-219·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has filed a plenary appeal from two orders of the circuit court: 1) granting partial summary judgment eliminating several damage claims and determining the only viable claim remaining was for property damage not exceeding $865 and 2) transferring the cause to the county court.

Neither order is a final appealable order nor is either subject to appeal as a nonfinal order. However, since the partial summary judgment cannot be reviewed on plenary appeal from the final judgment in the county court, we shall treat the appeal as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. Having so considered the matter, the petition is denied.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chrispen v. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing, Inc., 478 So. 2d 120, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2527, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

478 So. 2d 120 (Chrispen v. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amelco Investment Corp. v. Bryant Electric Co.
487 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)