Chrisman v. Long
1 Smith & H. 121
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chrisman v. Long. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Ind. 212 →
Opinion
“ This state of facts may show a right of action in favor of Long against Chrisrnan, but, does not warrant a joint judgment against the latter and McLaughlin. If we regard the payment by Long simply as a payment upon the judgment of Blackley, Strong, and Simpson, the request of Chrisrnan was not sufficient to bind McLaughlin, and it is a clearly established principle, that no assumpsit can be raised on the voluntary payment by a stranger, of the debt of another person.”
Judgment reversed, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chrisman v. Long, 1 Smith & H. 121 (Ind. 1848).
1 Smith & H. 121 (Chrisman v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.