Chris Krych v. Wendell Anderson

112 F. App'x 547
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2004
Docket04-1520
StatusUnpublished

This text of 112 F. App'x 547 (Chris Krych v. Wendell Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chris Krych v. Wendell Anderson, 112 F. App'x 547 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Chris Krych, who is currently housed in the Administrative Control Unit of the Minnesota Correctional Facility-Oak Park Heights, appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for *548 contempt, which he brought pursuant to a consent decree entered in Hines v. Anderson, 439 F.Supp. 12 (D.Minn.1977).

Having carefully reviewed the record, we cannot say the district court abused its discretion in finding that the defendants substantially complied with the Hines decree, and thus in denying Krych’s contempt motion. See Wycoff v. Hedgepeth, 34 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.1994) (standard of review; substantial, good-faith compliance is defense).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We also deny Krych’s motion for release.

1

. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, Unit *548 ed States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F. App'x 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chris-krych-v-wendell-anderson-ca8-2004.