Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 2013

Docket12-1641

StatusUnpublished

This text of Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc. (Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Foundry Networks, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as CMS Technologies, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FOUNDRY NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2012-1641 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 06-CV-13936, Judge Avern Cohn. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

RICHARD W. HOFFMANN, Reising Ethington PC, of Troy, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

NEAL KUMAR KATYAL, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were FREDERICK LIU; K.T. CHERIAN and CONSTANCE F. RAMOS, of San Francisco, California. Of counsel was ELIZABETH BARCHAS PRELOGAR, of Washing- ton, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 4, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI