Chreptak v. Haas

166 A.D.2d 856

This text of 166 A.D.2d 856 (Chreptak v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chreptak v. Haas, 166 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Esworthy, J.), entered January 8, 1990, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, to direct respondent to pay for support of the parties’ children.

The record establishes that the child support award herein [857]*857was made in compliance with the requirements of the Child Support Standards Act (see, Family Ct Act § 413, as amended by L 1989, ch 567), and the factual findings upon which the award is based are supported by the evidence. The order must, therefore, be affirmed.

Order affirmed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Mercure, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 413
New York FCT § 413

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chreptak-v-haas-nyappdiv-1990.