Chowdhury v. Ashcroft
This text of 94 F. App'x 233 (Chowdhury v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aktar Chowdhury initially petitioned this court for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge (IJ)’s decision denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. After Chowdhury filed his petition for review in this court, the BIA granted his application to reopen his removal proceedings, sustained Chow *234 dhury’s appeal, withdrew the IJ’s order of removal, and remanded to the IJ for further proceedings and the entry of a new decision. Chowdhury then moved this court for dismissal of his petition without prejudice as moot.
The exhaustion requirement is statutorily mandated and is jurisdictional. Townsend v. United States Dep’t of Justice INS, 799 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir.1986); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of Chowdhury’s appeal from the IJ’s denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings and Chowdhury’s petition for review is moot. See Townsend, 799 F.2d at 181-82.
Petition for review DISMISSED as moot; motion to dismiss DENIED as unnecessary.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chowdhury-v-ashcroft-ca5-2004.