Chowaniec v. Morgan

262 A.D.2d 1001, 691 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7194

This text of 262 A.D.2d 1001 (Chowaniec v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chowaniec v. Morgan, 262 A.D.2d 1001, 691 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The testimony of defendant that he did nothing with respect to the operation of his vehicle when he first observed the oncoming third-party defendant’s vehicle making a left turn in front of him raises an issue of fact whether defendant exercised reasonable care to avoid a collision (cf., Wasserman v Wong, 181 AD2d 672). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wasserman v. Wong
181 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 1001, 691 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chowaniec-v-morgan-nyappdiv-1999.