Chow v. Ebey

Seventh Circuit

Chow v. Ebey

2 F.2d 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2300

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 16, 1924·No. No. 3443·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Second Assistant Secretary of Labor ordered the deportation of appellant, who now challenges the authority of an Assistant Secretary to make the order. It is customary for the Second Assistant Secretary of Labor to hear and dispose of Chinese deportation cases, and his action in ordering deportation has been sanctioned by various district courts. We agree with the conclusion of Judge Hand, expressed in United States ex rel. Chin Fook Wah v. Dunton (D. C.) 288 F. 959. See, also, Parish v. United States, 100 U. S. 504, 25 L. Ed. 763; M’Collum v. United States. 17 Ct. Cl. 100; Norris v. United States, 257 U. S. 77, 42 S. Ct. 9, 66 L. Ed. 136. The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Second Assistant Secretary of Labor ordered the deportation of appellant, who now challenges the authority of an Assistant Secretary to make the order. It is customary for the Second Assistant Secretary of Labor to hear and dispose of Chinese deportation cases, and his action in ordering deportation has been sanctioned by various district courts. We agree with the conclusion of Judge Hand, expressed in United States ex rel. Chin Fook Wah v. Dunton (D. C.) 288 F. 959. See, also, Parish v. United States, 100 U. S. 504, 25 L. Ed. 763; M’Collum v. United States. 17 Ct. Cl. 100; Norris v. United States, 257 U. S. 77, 42 S. Ct. 9, 66 L. Ed. 136. The order is affirmed.

Chow v. Ebey, 2 F.2d 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2300 (7th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

2 F.2d 1023 (Chow v. Ebey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related