Chow v. Ebey

2 F.2d 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2300
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1924
DocketNo. 3443
StatusPublished

This text of 2 F.2d 1023 (Chow v. Ebey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chow v. Ebey, 2 F.2d 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2300 (7th Cir. 1924).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Second Assistant Secretary of Labor ordered the deportation of appellant, who now challenges the authority of an Assistant Secretary to make the order. It is customary for the Second Assistant Secretary of Labor to hear and dispose of Chinese deportation cases, and his action in ordering deportation has been sanctioned by various district courts. We agree with the conclusion of Judge Hand, expressed in United States ex rel. Chin Fook Wah v. Dunton (D. C.) 288 F. 959. See, also, Parish v. United States, 100 U. S. 504, 25 L. Ed. 763; M’Collum v. United States. 17 Ct. Cl. 100; Norris v. United States, 257 U. S. 77, 42 S. Ct. 9, 66 L. Ed. 136. The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parish v. United States
100 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 1880)
Norris v. United States
257 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Barile v. Department of Highways
17 Ct. Cl. 100 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1988)
United States ex rel. Chin Fook Wah v. Dunton
288 F. 959 (S.D. New York, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F.2d 1023, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chow-v-ebey-ca7-1924.