Chow v. Dewey

4 F. App'x 523
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2001
DocketNo. 00-55619; No. CC-99-01333-MABK
StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. App'x 523 (Chow v. Dewey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chow v. Dewey, 4 F. App'x 523 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

John F. and Esther Chow appeal pro se the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in the Chows’ nondischargeability action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal.

Prior panels of this court have sanctioned the Chows fpr filing frivolous appeals in Chow v. Giordano, No. 93-56162, 1994 WL 192112 (9th Cir. May 16, 1994) (unpublished memorandum) ($1500), and Chow v. Westerfelt, No. 98-55426, 1999 WL 313644 (9th Cir. Mar. 22, 1999) (unpublished memorandum) ($500). Since the Chows have failed to pay the assessed sanctions, we dismiss this appeal. See Hymes v. United States, 993 F.2d 701, 702 (9th Cir.1993) (dismissing appellant’s appeal for failure to pay previously imposed sanctions).

Appellants’ motion to enter default judgment against appellees is denied.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald L. Hymes v. United States
993 F.2d 701 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Chow v. Giordano
24 F.3d 245 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F. App'x 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chow-v-dewey-ca9-2001.