Chow Lau Lin Restaurants, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chow Lau Lin Restaurants, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

55 A.D.2d 513, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15144

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 513 (Chow Lau Lin Restaurants, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chow Lau Lin Restaurants, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 55 A.D.2d 513, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 24, 1975, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Hughes, J., at Special Term. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns and Nunez, JJ.; Capozzoli and Yesawich, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum: Although a heavy penalty was imposed it was not excessive and therefore the court should not have substituted its judgment for that of the State Liquor Authority. Moreover, it appears that confirmation of the authority’s determination will ensure comparative fairness and evenness of treatment amongst its licensees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 24, 1975, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Hughes, J., at Special Term. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns and Nunez, JJ.; Capozzoli and Yesawich, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum: Although a heavy penalty was imposed it was not excessive and therefore the court should not have substituted its judgment for that of the State Liquor Authority. Moreover, it appears that confirmation of the authority’s determination will ensure comparative fairness and evenness of treatment amongst its licensees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 513, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chow-lau-lin-restaurants-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1976.