Chouteau v. Allen

170 F. 412, 95 C.C.A. 582, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4718
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1909
DocketNo. 2,822
StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. 412 (Chouteau v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chouteau v. Allen, 170 F. 412, 95 C.C.A. 582, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4718 (8th Cir. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Circuit Court in this case is affirmed upon the authority of Westhus v. Union Trust Co. (C. C. A.) 164 Fed. 795, on rehearing 168 Fed. 617.

NOTE. — The following is the opinion of Dyer, District Judge, in the Circuit Court:

DYER, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the executors of the last will and testament of Charles P. Chouteau against the collector of internal revenue for the First collection district of Missouri for moneys alleged to have been paid to the collector (under protest) on an assessment duly made against the executors of the estate of Charles l’. Chouteau. Charles P. Chouteau died on the 5th day of January, 1801. At the time of his death, and of the making of the will (hereinafter mentioned) by him, the following statutes of the United States were in force (Act June 13, 1898, c. 448, 30 Stat. 461 rtJ. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2307]):

“Sec. 29. That any person or persons having in charge or trust, as administrators, executors, or trustees, any legacies or distributive shares arising from personal property, where the whole amount of such personal property as aforesaid shall exceed tlie sum of ten thousand dollars in actual value, passing, after the jmssage of this act, from any person possessed of such property, oil her by will or by the intestate laws of any state or territory, or any personal property or interest therein, transferred by deed, grant, bargain, sale or gift, made or intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment after the death of tlie grantor, or bargainer, to any person or persons, or to any body or bodies, politic or corporate, in trust or otherwise, shall be, and hereby are, made subject to a duty or tax, to be paid to the United States, as follows: * * ®

“Sec. 30. That the tax or duty aforesaid shall be a lien and charge upon the property of every person who may die as aforesaid for twenty years, or until the same shall, within that period, be fully paid to and discharged by the United States; and every executor, administrator, or trustee, before payment and distribution to the legatees, or any parties entitled to beneficial interest therein, shall pay to the collector or deputy collector of the district of which the deceased person was a resident the amount of the duty or tax assessed upon such legacy or distributive share, and shall also make and render to tlie said collector or deputy collector a schedule, list or statement, in duplicate, of the amount of such legacy, or distributive share, together with the amount of duty which has accrued, or shall accrue thereon, verified by his oath or affirmation, to be administered and certified tlioreon by some magistrate or officer having lawful power to administer such oaths, in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, which schedule, list or statement shall contain tlie names of each and every person entitled to any beneficial interest therein, together with tlie clear value of such interest, the duplicate of which schedule, list or statement shall be by him immediately delivered, and the tax thereon paid to such collector: and upon such payment and delivery of such schedule, list or stato[414]*414ment, said collector or deputy collector shall grant to such person paying such duty or tax a receipt or receipts for the same in duplicate, which shall be prepared as hereinafter provided. Such receipt or receipts duly signed and delivered by such collector or deputy collector, shall be sufficient evidence to entitle such executor, administrator or trustee to be credited and allowed such payment by every tribunal which, by the laws of any state or territory is, or may be, empowered to decide upon and settle the accounts of executors and administrators. * * * ”

The will of Charles P. Chouteau, or so much thereof as is pertinent to the question under consideration, is as follows:

“Section Four (4): All the rest and residue of my estate, excluding the .$50,000.00 and any additions thereto embraced in section two, but including the remainder, subject to the life estate bequeathed and devised in section three to my wife, I give, bequeath and devise as follows, that is to say: To my son, Pierre Chouteau and to his heirs and assigns, one-fourth part thereof; and the remaining three-fourths part thereof, including whatever remains at the death of my said son Henry of the said principal sum of $50,000.00 (any accumulations which may have been added thereto) mentioned in section two, X give, bequeath and devise to (plaintiffs as trustees and successors in trust of others named) and to their heirs and successors in trust, but in trust and upon the following trust, that is to say: To collect the rents, issues, profits and income thereof and therefrom, and after paying the taxes and other proper and necessary charges thereon and on account thereof, to pay over, in quarterly installments, the net annual balance as follows, viz.: . To my daughter Emily A. Henshaw (wife of John M. Henshaw) during and only during her life, one-third of said net balance; to my daughter Anne V. Johnson (wife of D. D. Johnson) during and only during her life, one-third of such net balance; and to my daughter Marie J. Chouteau, during and only during her life, the remaining third of such net balance. And I direct that each of my said three daughters shall receive and hold her portion of said net income, aforesaid, as a sole and separate estate, it being my intention to exclude any husband either of them now has or may hereafter have from any interest in or control over said income, and from any and all rights, interest or estate, as tenants by the curtesy, or otherwise, in said trust property aforesaid, or in any part thereof. And neither of my said' daughters shall have any right or power to devise, bequeath, transfer or convey any right or interest or estate in said trust property, or in any part thereof, or in her said portion of said net income, or in any manner to anticipate the same, either by mortgage, .pledge, hypothecation, or by any other method or means of incumbrance or disposition, and it is my will and I direct that upon the death of each of my said daughters, if she leaves a child or children, surviving her, one-third of the corpus or principal of said trust property in the hands of said trustee shall pass to and vest in her said child or children, and in the deseendahts (living at the death of my said daughter), such descendant or descendants taking the portion its or their parent would have taken had such parent survived my said daughter; and said trustees shall transfer and convey, in the proportions aforesaid, said one-third of said corpus or principal of said trust property to said child or children, and the descendant or descendants, if any, of such deceased child or children; provided, however, and it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westhus v. Union Trust Co. of St. Louis
164 F. 795 (Eighth Circuit, 1908)
Westhus v. Union Trust Co. of St. Louis
168 F. 617 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 F. 412, 95 C.C.A. 582, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chouteau-v-allen-ca8-1909.