Choudhry v. U-Haul, Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Choudhry v. U-Haul, Co.

911 So. 2d 1287, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16141, 2005 WL 2493385

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2005·No. Nos. 1D04-3573, 1D04-5009·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Zahid Choudhry and his wife, Zakia Choudhry, appeal two final orders, one granting summary judgment for the defendant, U-Haul Company of Florida, and the other granting summary judgment for the defendants, Latasha Martin and Cedric Maultsby. We reject the defendants’ argument that the injury in this case was too remote to support an action based on a claim of negligence. Because the issue of forseeability, as it relates to causation, involved a factual question for the jury, the defendants were not entitled to judgments as a matter of law.

Reversed.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Zahid Choudhry and his wife, Zakia Choudhry, appeal two final orders, one granting summary judgment for the defendant, U-Haul Company of Florida, and the other granting summary judgment for the defendants, Latasha Martin and Cedric Maultsby. We reject the defendants’ argument that the injury in this case was too remote to support an action based on a claim of negligence. Because the issue of forseeability, as it relates to causation, involved a factual question for the jury, the defendants were not entitled to judgments as a matter of law.

Reversed.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Choudhry v. U-Haul, Co., 911 So. 2d 1287, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16141, 2005 WL 2493385 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

911 So. 2d 1287 (Choudhry v. U-Haul, Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.