Chou v. Pan-Chin Chou
This text of 66 A.D.2d 791 (Chou v. Pan-Chin Chou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, for divorce, the defendant wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 6, 1978, which denied her motion for an interim counsel fee. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A review of the record on appeal indicates that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of defendant’s motion for a counsel fee. Defendant’s remedy for any inequity in the matter is to proceed to a speedy trial, at which she can seek to establish her right to a counsel fee. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A.D.2d 791, 411 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chou-v-pan-chin-chou-nyappdiv-1978.