Chorn v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Chorn v. State

841 S.W.2d 627, 311 Ark. 381, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 750

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 21, 1992·No. CR 92-1393·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Brenda Chorn, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Brenda Chorn will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Brenda Chorn, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.

However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Brenda Chorn will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.

Chorn v. State, 841 S.W.2d 627, 311 Ark. 381, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 750 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

841 S.W.2d 627 (Chorn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.