Chorman's v. Queen Anne's Railroad

53 A. 438, 19 Del. 417, 3 Penne. 417, 1901 Del. LEXIS 42
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedOctober 17, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 53 A. 438 (Chorman's v. Queen Anne's Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chorman's v. Queen Anne's Railroad, 53 A. 438, 19 Del. 417, 3 Penne. 417, 1901 Del. LEXIS 42 (Del. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

He testified from the stand that he alone was in possession of it. You allege that Comfort E. Chorman alone was in possession.

Let a nonsuit be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A. 438, 19 Del. 417, 3 Penne. 417, 1901 Del. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chormans-v-queen-annes-railroad-delsuperct-1901.