Chorbajian v. Goldhirsch Group, Inc.

S.D. New York

Chorbajian v. Goldhirsch Group, Inc.

814 F. Supp. 333, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20757, 1992 WL 455479

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedApril 7, 1992

Docket91 Civ. 4287 (VLB)

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 814 F. Supp. 333 (Chorbajian v. Goldhirsch Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chorbajian v. Goldhirsch Group, Inc., 814 F. Supp. 333, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20757, 1992 WL 455479 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

In this age discrimination case, plaintiff, over 40, was hired and quickly fired and replaced by younger employees; her dismissal was based on a single incident of submis *334 sion of an expense item for dining with a person involved in the same industry and known to plaintiffs employer to be someone she planned to see, and who was characterized on plaintiffs expense report by the name of her former employer.

Plaintiffs supervisor never asked plaintiff for any information about the business basis for the meeting or the reasons for the way the form was filled out before recommending dismissal.

I find sufficient evidence of discrimination and of possible pretextual dismissal to create genuine issues of material fact and therefore deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI