Choquette v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Choquette v. Bennett

149 A. 892, 111 Conn. 718, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 185

DecidedMarch 6, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 149 A. 892 (Choquette v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Choquette v. Bennett, 149 A. 892, 111 Conn. 718, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 185 (Colo. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is pursued upon the sole ground that the damages are excessive. The special damages might reasonably have been found to be $2315.25. The physical injury was severe and included a twenty-five per cent permanent partial disability to plaintiff’s left leg. Although he was seventy-one years of age at the time of this accident it cannot be held as matter of law that the assessment of damages of $4200 for the injury plaintiff suffered is excessive, giving due weight to the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal is pursued upon the sole ground that the damages are excessive. The special damages might reasonably have been found to be $2315.25. The physical injury was severe and included a twenty-five per cent permanent partial disability to plaintiff’s left leg. Although he was seventy-one years of age at the time of this accident it cannot be held as matter of law that the assessment of damages of $4200 for the injury plaintiff suffered is excessive, giving due weight to the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A. 892, 111 Conn. 718, 1930 Conn. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choquette-v-bennett-conn-1930.