Chopak v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chopak v. Walker

275 A.D.2d 669

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 669 (Chopak v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chopak v. Walker, 275 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

In our opinion the trial court unduly limited appellant’s cross-examination with respect to the circumstances surrounding respondent’s retainer by appellant and as to the circumstances surrounding disciplinary action referred to in respondent’s testimony. Such evidence, if adduced, might have thrown additional light on the facts to be considered in appraising the value of respondent’s services. Rolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 781.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In our opinion the trial court unduly limited appellant’s cross-examination with respect to the circumstances surrounding respondent’s retainer by appellant and as to the circumstances surrounding disciplinary action referred to in respondent’s testimony. Such evidence, if adduced, might have thrown additional light on the facts to be considered in appraising the value of respondent’s services. Rolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 781.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chopak-v-walker-nyappdiv-1949.