Chopak v. Sidney
4 A.D.2d 965, 168 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3840
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 25, 1957·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss a counterclaim to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution on the ground it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Halberstadt v. New York Life Ins. Co., 194 N. T. 1; Schneider v. Schlang, 159 App. Div. 385; Sidorsky v. Lemkin, 188 N. T. S. 401; Restatements, Torts, §§ 653, 654.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chopak v. Sidney, 4 A.D.2d 965, 168 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
4 A.D.2d 965 (Chopak v. Sidney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schneider v. Schlang
159 A.D. 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)