Chopak v. Sidney
This text of 4 A.D.2d 965 (Chopak v. Sidney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss a counterclaim to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution on the ground it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Halberstadt v. New York Life Ins. Co., 194 N. T. 1; Schneider v. Schlang, 159 App. Div. 385; Sidorsky v. Lemkin, 188 N. T. S. 401; Restatements, Torts, §§ 653, 654.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.2d 965, 168 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chopak-v-sidney-nyappdiv-1957.