Chopak v. Olvany

235 A.D. 743

This text of 235 A.D. 743 (Chopak v. Olvany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chopak v. Olvany, 235 A.D. 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order granting defendants’ motion to strike case from calendar as being improperly preferred, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. While the legal residence of plaintiff during certain periods is rendered obscure by contradictory statements indicating it to be Rockland county, a consideration of all his acts indicates that Rockland county was merely a place of temporary sojourn and that when the cause of action arose he was and still is a resident of Kings county. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Carswell, JJ., concur: Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chopak-v-olvany-nyappdiv-1932.