Chonigman v. County of Westchester

192 A.D.2d 499, 595 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3460
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 5, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 499 (Chonigman v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chonigman v. County of Westchester, 192 A.D.2d 499, 595 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—In an action for a judgment declaring Local Laws, 1991, No. 8 of the County of Westchester unconstitutional, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered June 19, 1992, which is in favor of the defendants and against them.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, it is declared that Local Laws, 1991, No. 8 of the County of Westchester is unconstitutional, and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

By its own admission, and without elaborating on the procedure employed, the County of Westchester estimated the populations of certain Federal census block segments in setting the legislative district boundaries created by Local Laws, 1991, No. 8 of the County of Westchester. Because the County’s population figures were not based on Federal census figures, but were based on the County’s base estimates, the resulting reapportionment plan is constitutionally defective [500]*500(see, Seaman v Fedourich, 16 NY2d 94, 104; Honig v Rensselaer County Legislature, 37 AD2d 658, affd 29 NY2d 630; Thayer v Garraghan, 28 AD2d 584; cf., Thayer v Garraghan, 29 AD2d 825, affd 21 NY2d 881).

The case is remitted to the Supreme Court and the County is directed to promptly return with a plan for reapportionment based upon Federal census figures. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valentino v. County of Tompkins
288 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Brooklyn Heights Ass'n v. Macchiarola
192 A.D.2d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Town of Scarsdale v. County of Westchester
192 A.D.2d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D.2d 499, 595 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chonigman-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1993.