Chong Su Yi v. Capital One N.A.

600 F. App'x 124
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1015·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Capital One N.A., No. 8:14-cv-03828-GJH (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chong Su Yi v. Capital One N.A., 600 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2015).

600 F. App'x 124 (Chong Su Yi v. Capital One N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related