Chong Su Kirk Yi v. Pepco Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Pepco Holdings, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-03837-PJM (D.Md. Dec. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
574 F. App'x 247 (Chong Su Kirk Yi v. Pepco Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.