Chong Kee Jan v. United States
This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 476 (Chong Kee Jan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Bak hop, lotus nuts, sui sit, yuk chuk, wai san, sar sum, lo hon qua, mok qua, and yuen yuk the same as that passed upon in Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs; (2) wai san, sliced; yuk juk, sliced; and sar sum, sliced, the same as that the subject of Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States, supra, were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced; and (3) merchandise similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 29022 was held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 775 as vegetables, prepared or preserved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Cust. Ct. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chong-kee-jan-v-united-states-cusc-1950.