Chong Kee Jan & Co. v. United States
This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 254 (Chong Kee Jan & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the protests were sustained as follows: (1) Kumquats similar' in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Fung Chong Co. (34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) were held dutiable at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges; (2) lotus nuts the same as those involved in Oy Wo Tong Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held free of duty under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs; (3) fish in lard with beans similar to the merchandise passed upon in Abstract 42516 was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as nonenumerated manufactured articles; and (4) articles in part of bamboo the same as those the subject of Abstract 50981 were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Cust. Ct. 254, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chong-kee-jan-co-v-united-states-cusc-1948.