Chon v. United States

District Court, D. Utah·Decided December 30, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-00135·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

TAE H. CHON, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND . ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET Petitioner, ASIDE JUDGMENT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civil Case No. 1:19-CV-135 TS Criminal Case No. 2:01-CR-487 TS Respondent. District Judge Ted Stewart

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Petitioner seeks relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1). That provision allows for relief where there has been a “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” “[T]he ‘mistake’ provision in Rule 60(b)(1) provides for the reconsideration of judgments only where: (1) a party has made an excusable litigation mistake or an attorney in the litigation has acted without authority from a party, or (2) where the judge has made a substantive mistake of law or fact in the final judgment or order.”! Having carefully considered Petitioner’s Motion, the Court finds that he has failed to demonstrate a mistake of law or fact. It is therefore ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment (Docket No. 4) is DENIED. DATED this 30th day of December, 2019. BY THE COURT:

d Stewart fted States District Judge

' Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc., 98 F.3d 572, 576 (10th Cir. 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chon v. United States, (D. Utah 2019).

Chon v. United States (Chon v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc.
98 F.3d 572 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)