Chojnacki v. Rogers
891 N.E.2d 767, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1405
Opinions
Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed May 5, 2008:
“[Wlhether a decision denying a request for appointment of counsel in a reclassification hearing held pursuant to Ohio’s version of the Adam Walsh Act, Senate Bill 10, is a final appealable order.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chojnacki v. Rogers, 891 N.E.2d 767, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008).
891 N.E.2d 767 (Chojnacki v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Objection to Reclassification Brown, 9-08-18 (10-20-2008)
2008 Ohio 5403 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)