Choisnet v. Wilson

262 A.D. 1017, 30 N.Y.S.2d 851

This text of 262 A.D. 1017 (Choisnet v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Choisnet v. Wilson, 262 A.D. 1017, 30 N.Y.S.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Determination confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to annul the commissioner’s determination. On the facts adduced the commissioner should have approved the recommendation of the trial commissioner dismissing the stated charges as not proved. It also appears that the commissioner in dismissing petitioner considered another charge that had not been made in any form whatever. (See Matter of Meyer v. Goldwater, 286 N. Y. 461; reargument denied, Id. 697.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Meyer v. Goldwater
36 N.E.2d 663 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 1017, 30 N.Y.S.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choisnet-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1941.