Choice v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Choice v. State

114 S.E. 551, 29 Ga. App. 215, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 175

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1922

Docket13923

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 551 (Choice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Choice v. State, 114 S.E. 551, 29 Ga. App. 215, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new tri&l are but amplifications of the general grounds; the evidence amply supports the verdict, no error of law appears, and the trial judge properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new tri&l are but amplifications of the general grounds; the evidence amply supports the verdict, no error of law appears, and the trial judge properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 S.E. 551, 29 Ga. App. 215, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choice-v-state-gactapp-1922.