Choice v. Garner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Choice v. Garner

654 So. 2d 309, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 1995 WL 293705

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2527

StatusPublished

This text of 654 So. 2d 309 (Choice v. Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Choice v. Garner, 654 So. 2d 309, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 1995 WL 293705 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a final order of dismissal in which the trial court denied appellant’s motion for leave of court to file an amended complaint. We find that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to not allow appellant leave to amend her complaint, especially since there were no prior amendments. See Thompson v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 615 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a final order of dismissal in which the trial court denied appellant’s motion for leave of court to file an amended complaint. We find that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to not allow appellant leave to amend her complaint, especially since there were no prior amendments. See Thompson v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., 615 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

654 So. 2d 309, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5246, 1995 WL 293705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choice-v-garner-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack