Choi v. Cataldo
This text of Choi v. Cataldo (Choi v. Cataldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 23-MAY-2024 08:17 AM Dkt. 12 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
HYE JA CHOI, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE LISA W. CATALDO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, in place of Ginoza, J., recused)
Upon consideration of self-represented petitioner Hye Ja
Choi’s March 8, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus (petition),
the March 15, 2024 supplemental submission, the March 25, 2024
notice, and the record, petitioner has not demonstrated a clear
and indisputable right to relief, and/or a lack of alternative
means to obtain the relief sought. See Womble Bond Dickinson
(US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawaiʻi 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359,
1361 (1996).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 23, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Catherine H. Remigio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Choi v. Cataldo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choi-v-cataldo-haw-2024.