Choi v. Brown University

CourtDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island
DecidedJuly 23, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-00191
StatusUnknown

This text of Choi v. Brown University (Choi v. Brown University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Choi v. Brown University, (D.R.I. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

JOHN DOE, : Plaintiff : : v. : No. 1:20-cv-191-MSM-LDA : BROWN UNIVERSITY, : Defendant :

O R D E R

Without filing for leave to do so, John Doe, on behalf of himself and a putative class of similarly-situated Brown University students, filed this action using a pseudonym, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 10(a). The University objects and has requested Mr. Doe to show cause why he should be able to proceed without disclosing his name. A party seeking to proceed anonymously bears a heavy burden to overcome the presumption of public disclosure of his name. An “overriding reason for confidentiality” can surmount that presumption, if it appears the party may suffer harassment, a likelihood of injury, discrimination, or other articulable and non- speculative harm. , 744 F. Supp. 40, 41-42 (D.R.I. 1990) (desire to protect the privacy of a deceased child who died of AIDS understandable but not sufficient). Mr. Doe’s claims here that he may suffer stigma or other harm are entirely speculative in comparison to the fears of a transsexual in 1990 seeking medical insurance benefits. 764 F. Supp. 72 (D.R.I. 1992) (leave to proceed by pseudonym granted, citing interest in sexual privacy and documented discrimination). He has submitted

nothing to substantiate a legitimate fear of retaliation from fellow students or others on or off campus. ECF No. 19, Exh. B. Brown University’s Motion to Require Mr. Doe to Show Cause (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED and I find no cause has been shown to excuse the requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). In accordance with the request of the plaintiff, he has fourteen (14) days in which to re-submit his complaint properly styled or to dismiss it if he decides

not to proceed. IT IS SO ORDERED:

___________________________ Mary S. McElroy, United States District Judge

July 23, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
744 F. Supp. 40 (D. Rhode Island, 1990)
Great Prize, S.A. v. Mariner Shipping Pty., Ltd.
764 F. Supp. 69 (E.D. Louisiana, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Choi v. Brown University, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choi-v-brown-university-rid-2020.