Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co. v. Locke

84 S.W. 1069, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 191, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 432
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 1, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 84 S.W. 1069 (Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co. v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co. v. Locke, 84 S.W. 1069, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 191, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 432 (Tex. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

*192 FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by the appellee against the Southern Bailway Company, the St. Louis & Southwestern Bailway Company, the International & Great Northern Bailroad Company, the Texas Pacific Baihvay Company, Kansas City Southern Bailway Company and the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Bailway Company, to recover damages in the sum of $600.

The judgment shows that all of the defendants except the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Bailroad Company were dismissed from the case, and judgment by default in the sum of $435 was rendered against the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Bailroad Company, from which judgment this road appealed.

The notice of appeal was given by a party merely as amicus curiae. It does not appear that at the time he was the agent for the railway company, or in any wise connected with the same; nor does it appear that he was the attorney for that company; but the fact is indisputable that he was merely acting as amicus curiae in giving the notice of appeal-

A motion is made and filed in this court asking us to dismiss the appeal, because notice of appeal was not given by the railway company or any person authorized to act for it. It is unnecessary for us to undertake to state what is the authority of an amicus curiae, or what office or function he may perform in appearing before the court and offering such suggestions as he may see proper to make, as we are clearly of the opinion that he has no power to represent a party in, giving notice of appeal.

The motion is sustained and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Bailroad Company.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.
65 S.W.2d 762 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1933)
Mallory S. S. Co. v. G. A. Bahn Diamond & Optical Co.
154 S.W. 282 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.W. 1069, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 191, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choctaw-oklahoma-gulf-railway-co-v-locke-texapp-1905.