Choate v. Matthewson
This text of 157 A.D. 901 (Choate v. Matthewson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the evidence presented on the question of fact as to the agency of Fred S. Matthewson for his wife, Anna E. Matthewson, in a contract for the sale of the property in question, should have been submitted to the jury. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.D. 901, 141 N.Y.S. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choate-v-matthewson-nyappdiv-1913.