Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Choat v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION

Choat v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION

32 So. 3d 1134, 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 1073, 2010 La. App. LEXIS 351, 2010 WL 795365
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 10, 2010
DocketCA 09-1073
StatusPublished

This text of 32 So. 3d 1134 (Choat v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Choat v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, 32 So. 3d 1134, 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 1073, 2010 La. App. LEXIS 351, 2010 WL 795365 (La. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

EZELL, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Tilley v. Boise Cascade Corp., et al, 09-1072 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/10/10), 32 So.3d 1130, in which a separate decision has been rendered, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this ease is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs are assessed against Boise Cascade Corporation and Dennis Wallace.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tilley v. Boise Cascade Corp.
32 So. 3d 1130 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New Orleans
118 So. 841 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 So. 3d 1134, 9 La.App. 3 Cir. 1073, 2010 La. App. LEXIS 351, 2010 WL 795365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choat-v-boise-cascade-corporation-lactapp-2010.