Chmielewski v. TMS International, LLC

685 F. App'x 486
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 8, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1042
StatusPublished

This text of 685 F. App'x 486 (Chmielewski v. TMS International, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chmielewski v. TMS International, LLC, 685 F. App'x 486 (7th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

John Chmielewski sued his employer, TMS International, LLC, for following IRS instructions in a “lock-in” letter to withhold taxes from his wages despite his asserted tax exemption. Chmielewski requested that his withheld funds be re[487]*487turned and that TMS cease withholding. The district court dismissed Chmielewski’s claims because it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over his request for injunctive relief and he had not otherwise stated a claim. The court noted that the suit was foreclosed by our ruling in Edgar v. Inland Steel Co., 744 F.2d 1276, 1278 (7th Cir. 1984), in which we stated that “[e]m-ployees have no cause of action against employers to recover wages withheld and paid over to the government in satisfaction of federal income tax liability.”

On appeal Chmielewski continues to assert that he is exempt from federal income tax and says that Edgar was wrongly decided because the plaintiffs there were also exempt. But this is not a “compelling reason” to overturn our precedent. United States v. Lara-Unzueta, 735 F.3d 954, 961 (7th Cir. 2013). The judgment is AFFIRMED.

TMS moved for appellate attorney’s fees and costs under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Chmielew-ski has not responded. The district court warned him in its dismissal order that his tax-protestor arguments were frivolous, and this appeal is also frivolous. See Edgar, 744 F.2d at 1278 (“This lawsuit represents yet another disturbing example of a patently frivolous appeal filed by abusers of the tax system merely to delay and harass the collection of public revenues.”). TMS’s motion is GRANTED, and TMS shall file its bill of fees and costs within 14 days of the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Judy Edgar v. Inland Steel Company, a Corporation
744 F.2d 1276 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Miguel Lara-Unzueta
735 F.3d 954 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
685 F. App'x 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chmielewski-v-tms-international-llc-ca7-2017.