Chmielewski v. Almeter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chmielewski v. Almeter

195 A.D.2d 1087, 601 N.Y.S.2d 879

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 1993·Published

Opinion

Motion for extension of time granted to August 27, 1993. Memorandum: No further extensions will be granted on the basis that transcripts are unavailable. If counsel is unable to comply with the final deadline due to the unavailability of transcripts, a motion for summary reversal and a new trial should be made. Present— [1088]*1088Callahan, J. P., Pine, Balio, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed June 28, 1993.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for extension of time granted to August 27, 1993. Memorandum: No further extensions will be granted on the basis that transcripts are unavailable. If counsel is unable to comply with the final deadline due to the unavailability of transcripts, a motion for summary reversal and a new trial should be made. Present— [1088]*1088Callahan, J. P., Pine, Balio, Boomer and Davis, JJ. (Filed June 28, 1993.)

Chmielewski v. Almeter, 195 A.D.2d 1087, 601 N.Y.S.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

195 A.D.2d 1087 (Chmielewski v. Almeter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.