Chmela v. Vought
This text of 15 A.D.2d 812 (Chmela v. Vought) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs were in an automobile owned by one of them. While this automobile was motionless, it was struck in the rear by an automobile owned and operated by defendant. In view of the sharp dispute as to the force of the impact; as to the alleged injuries; and as to whether there were any injuries at all, there should be a trial of the entire case so that it may be determined whether the claimed injuries could and did result from the accident (Steinbach v. Denker, 13 A D 2d 795; Goldman v. Reese, 13 A D 2d 994; Ruppert v. Building Materials Dist., 10 A D 2d 621). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 812, 225 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chmela-v-vought-nyappdiv-1962.