Chitty v. Tisdale

45 So. 587, 154 Ala. 246, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 508
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 23, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 So. 587 (Chitty v. Tisdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chitty v. Tisdale, 45 So. 587, 154 Ala. 246, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 508 (Ala. 1908).

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

-This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court denying an application for a writ of [247]*247mandamus to be issued to the appellee as clerk of the circuit court.

The appellant was summoned as a special juror to attend court. He obeyed said summons, and attended court one day, but -was discharged without being sworn in as a juror, as the case in which he was summoned was continued. He made the proper affidavit, and the clerk issued to him a certificate for the number of miles traveled, but refused to issue any certificate for his attendance at the court one day. Sections 4580 and 4581 of the Code of 1896 provide that regular jurors shall be entitled to $2 for each day’s service, and that special jurors shall be entitled to the “same compensation for their attendance.” The statute seems to have been worded carefully, for the purpose of showing that the special juror shall not be deprived of his compensation by the mere fact that he is not sworn in as a juror. He attends court, and is required to remain there until he is discharged. It takes as much of his time as if he were sworn in, and he is as much subject to the orders of the court as a juror on the regular panel who does not happen to be called on to sit in a case during that day. There is no reason why he should not be entitled to his compensation.

The judgment of the court is reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered granting the writ as prayed.

Reversed and rendered.

Tyson, O. J., and Haralson and Denson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hines v. Salter
45 So. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 So. 587, 154 Ala. 246, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chitty-v-tisdale-ala-1908.