Chitty v. ALLIED CHEMICAL COMPANY

328 S.E.2d 476, 285 S.C. 106, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 358
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 27, 1985
Docket22266
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 328 S.E.2d 476 (Chitty v. ALLIED CHEMICAL COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chitty v. ALLIED CHEMICAL COMPANY, 328 S.E.2d 476, 285 S.C. 106, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 358 (S.C. 1985).

Opinion

Chandler, Justice:

*107 This is a Worker’s Compensation case in which Respondent Louise A. Chitty (Chitty) filed in Richland County Circuit Court an appeal from an adverse ruling of the Industrial Commission.

Appellants Allied Chemical Company (Allied) and Travelers Insurance Company (Company) moved to dismiss on grounds of lack of jurisdiction. From an order of the Circuit Judge denying the motion Allied and the Company appeal.

We reverse.

The parties agree that (1) Chitty’s injury occurred in Lexington County, and (2) that Allied’s principal place of business is in Lexington County.

The controlling statute is S. C. Code Ann. § 42-17-60 (1976 & Supp. 1983) which reads in part:

But either party to the dispute may ... appeal from the decision of the Commission to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which the alleged accident happened, or in which the employer resides or has his principal office.

The Circuit Judge held the statute to be not jurisdictional but venue in nature and transferred the appeal to Lexington. We disagree.

This precise question has been decided in Hedgepath v. Stanley Homes, 265 S. C. 248, 217 S. E. (2d) 782 (1975). There the employer filed in Richland County an appeal from an award of benefits for the death of an employee killed in Orangeburg County.

Here, as in Hedgepath, we hold the Circuit Court of Richland County had no jurisdiction over the appeal and lacked even limited jurisdiction or authority to transfer it to Lexington County.

Reversed.

Littlejohn, C. J., and Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.
442 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)
Williams v. South Carolina Department of Wildlife
367 S.E.2d 418 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 S.E.2d 476, 285 S.C. 106, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chitty-v-allied-chemical-company-sc-1985.