Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.

763 So. 2d 610
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 16, 2000
Docket2000-C-0414
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 So. 2d 610 (Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 763 So. 2d 610 (La. 2000).

Opinion

763 So.2d 610 (2000)

George CHITTENDEN and Roberta Kay Chittenden
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 2000-C-0414.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 2000.

Granted. Application granted on the issue of whether the attorney may recover interest on advances of funds to the client and, if so, the extent of recovery under the circumstances of this case. Otherwise, the application is denied.[1]

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

NOTES

[1] A committee is to be appointed to study the revision of Rule 1.8(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, regarding financial assistance to a client.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Maxwell
783 So. 2d 1244 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 So. 2d 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chittenden-v-state-farm-mut-automobile-ins-co-la-2000.