Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
763 So. 2d 610
Opinion
George CHITTENDEN and Roberta Kay Chittenden
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Application granted on the issue of whether the attorney may recover interest on advances of funds to the client and, if so, the extent of recovery under the circumstances of this case. Otherwise, the application is denied.[1]
KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
NOTES
[1] A committee is to be appointed to study the revision of Rule 1.8(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, regarding financial assistance to a client.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 763 So. 2d 610 (La. 2000).
763 So. 2d 610 (Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Maxwell
783 So. 2d 1244 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2001)