Chiswick Products, Ltd. v. The Ss Stolt Avance

387 F.2d 645, 1968 A.M.C. 324, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8515
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 1968
Docket23830
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 387 F.2d 645 (Chiswick Products, Ltd. v. The Ss Stolt Avance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chiswick Products, Ltd. v. The Ss Stolt Avance, 387 F.2d 645, 1968 A.M.C. 324, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8515 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Libel was instituted by appellants to recover for damage to a cargo of turpentine, incurred during its shipment from Brownsville, Texas,, to Europe aboard the SS Stolt Avance. Appellants made a prima facie case for recovery against the ship and her owners by introducing clean bills of lading and the stipulation that the cargo, when discharged, was damaged by suspended rust particles. Respondents defended on the ground that they had used due diligence in assuring the seaworthiness of the vessel prior to loading, and that the damage had been caused by Hurricane Carla, a peril of the sea.

The District Court, in its opinion reported at 257 F.Supp. 91, accepted the view of Respondents and adjudged them *646 not liable. Only the findings of fact are challenged on this appeal. We find ample support in the evidence for the thorough summary of the Court below; Appellants’ challenge falls far short of demonstrating clear error. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954); C. J. Dick Towing Co. v. The Leo, 202 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1953). The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
387 F.2d 645, 1968 A.M.C. 324, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiswick-products-ltd-v-the-ss-stolt-avance-ca5-1968.