Chisum's Lessee v. Wooten

Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity

Chisum's Lessee v. Wooten

1 Tenn. 338

Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity·Decided October 6, 1808·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When bond with reasons, have not been taken in the court below, we cannot supply *340 them, but the motion does not go to that point.—We are called upon to prevent an injury that would arise in consequence of the loss of the bond and reasons and it seems to us that it is proper we should do it. The loss of reasons for appeal is unimportant now. The cause is before us, and therefore the motion must prevail.

See as to loss of records, 2 Hay. 76, in n.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

When bond with reasons, have not been taken in the court below, we cannot supply *340 them, but the motion does not go to that point.—We are called upon to prevent an injury that would arise in consequence of the loss of the bond and reasons and it seems to us that it is proper we should do it. The loss of reasons for appeal is unimportant now. The cause is before us, and therefore the motion must prevail.

See as to loss of records, 2 Hay. 76, in n.

Chisum's Lessee v. Wooten, 1 Tenn. 338 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1808).

Pincite

1 Tenn. 338 (Chisum's Lessee v. Wooten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.