Chisnell v. Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement

Third Circuit

Chisnell v. Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement

998 F.2d 1002, 1993 WL 261073

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1993

Docket92-3664

StatusPublished

This text of 998 F.2d 1002 (Chisnell v. Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chisnell v. Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement, 998 F.2d 1002, 1993 WL 261073 (3d Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

998 F.2d 1002

Chisnell (Dolores), Estate of Robitzer (Albert J., Jr.),
Robitzer (Barbara), Jankour (Kristine D.)
v.
Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control
Enforcement, Pennsylvania State Police, Johnson
(Robert), Witkowski (Clair), Sandrovich
(Steve), McDonald (James ),
Randic (Ronald K.)

NO. 92-3664

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 30, 1993

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

Standish, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI