Chism v. Wilkerson
68 S.E. 425, 134 Ga. 636, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 298
Opinion
Under the ruling in Ratteree v. Morrow, 71 Ga. 528, where
a protest is filed to the return of proeessioners by the party notified, and on the trial evidence is introduced on both sides, the applicant for the proceedings is entitled to open and conclude the argument,- and this is true although he may introduce in evidence the entire proceedings duly returned, and thus make out a prima facie case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chism v. Wilkerson, 68 S.E. 425, 134 Ga. 636, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 298 (Ga. 1910).
68 S.E. 425 (Chism v. Wilkerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowley v. Varn
84 S.E.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.
78 S.E. 905 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Castleberry v. Parrish
69 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)