Chism v. Wilkerson

68 S.E. 425, 134 Ga. 636, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 298
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 425 (Chism v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chism v. Wilkerson, 68 S.E. 425, 134 Ga. 636, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 298 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

Under the ruling in Ratteree v. Morrow, 71 Ga. 528, where

a protest is filed to the return of proeessioners by the party notified, and on the trial evidence is introduced on both sides, the applicant for the proceedings is entitled to open and conclude the argument,- and this is true although he may introduce in evidence the entire proceedings duly returned, and thus make out a prima facie case.

Judgment affirmed.

AH the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crowley v. Varn
84 S.E.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Georgia Talc Co. v. Cohutta Talc Co.
78 S.E. 905 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Castleberry v. Parrish
69 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 425, 134 Ga. 636, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chism-v-wilkerson-ga-1910.