Chism v. Varnedoe

22 S.E. 334, 96 Ga. 777
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 334 (Chism v. Varnedoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chism v. Varnedoe, 22 S.E. 334, 96 Ga. 777 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The hill of exceptions, as certified, containing only a portion of the evidence, and it being impossible to ascertain, therefrom whether or not the trial judge erred in rendering the-judgment complained of, which was a decision of the case upon the law and facts without the intervention of a jury; and the remainder of the evidence, purporting to be an exhibit to the bill of exceptions, being neither identified as such by the signature of the judge or otherwise, nor incorporated in a brief and made a. part of the record, so that this court could order the same to be certified and sent up by the clerk of the court below, the judgment must stand affirmed. Harman v. Strange, 62 Ga. 167; Masland v. Kemp, 70 Ga. 786. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fairburn Banking Co. v. Citizens Bank
93 S.E. 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Roberts v. City of Cairo
66 S.E. 938 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 334, 96 Ga. 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chism-v-varnedoe-ga-1895.