Chism v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Chism v. State

1913 OK CR 205, 132 P. 1192, 9 Okla. Crim. 726, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 31, 1913

DocketNo. A-1558.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 205 (Chism v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chism v. State, 1913 OK CR 205, 132 P. 1192, 9 Okla. Crim. 726, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county charged with having violated the prohibitory liquor *727 law, • and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail. We find no prejudicial error in the record which authorizes a reversal of the judgment. See section 6005, Rev. Laws 1910. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county charged with having violated the prohibitory liquor *727 law, • and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail. We find no prejudicial error in the record which authorizes a reversal of the judgment. See section 6005, Rev. Laws 1910. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 205, 132 P. 1192, 9 Okla. Crim. 726, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chism-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.