Chism v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Chism v. State

1913 OK CR 205, 132 P. 1192, 9 Okla. Crim. 726, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 31, 1913·No. No. A-1558.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county charged with having violated the prohibitory liquor *727 law, • and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail. We find no prejudicial error in the record which authorizes a reversal of the judgment. See section 6005, Rev. Laws 1910. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county charged with having violated the prohibitory liquor *727 law, • and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail. We find no prejudicial error in the record which authorizes a reversal of the judgment. See section 6005, Rev. Laws 1910. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Chism v. State, 1913 OK CR 205, 132 P. 1192, 9 Okla. Crim. 726, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 205 (Chism v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.